Versioned programme rounds
Publish approved eligibility, evidence, milestone and decision rules for a defined programme round.
Public and multi-entity programmes
Run Multi-Entity Mining Programmes With Clear Accountability
Run programme rounds, participant applications, human assessment and appeals, milestone monitoring and governed reporting across public, donor-backed, association and ASM programmes.
Request a programme assessmentGovern the Programme From Application to Report
OreLynx keeps participant organisations separate while accountable people assess evidence, request corrections, record decisions, manage independent appeals and monitor delivery milestones. Programme oversight sees only its authorised scope, and public outputs remain separate from private evidence.
Separate Reporting From Proof
A dashboard total is not self-validating. OreLynx preserves coverage, freshness, aggregation rules and the path back to authorised source evidence. It supports programme administration and reporting; it does not make autonomous eligibility decisions, execute funds or replace programme accounting.
Illustrative workflow modelGovernance-first programme path
- 01Open a governed roundPublish a versioned programme round with eligibility, evidence, milestones and decision roles.
- 02Collect participant evidenceKeep each organisation’s registration, application and supporting records inside its authorised boundary.
- 03Make human decisionsRoute missing evidence, assessment and decisions to accountable people with reasons and an independent appeal path.
- 04Monitor deliveryTrack participant milestones, corrections and evidence without allowing one organisation to see another’s private records.
- 05Report with controlSeparate internal oversight from approved public reporting, retain drill-back evidence and revoke access when required.
Questions That Must Be Answered Before Configuration
- Which organisation is accountable for each data class and programme decision?
- Which participants need isolation, delegated administration or cross-entity oversight?
- Which measures require supporting evidence, review, correction and publication approval?
- Which countries, providers, languages, support models and procurement rules are actually approved?
For programme sponsors
Govern Participant Decisions and Delivery Evidence
Public, donor, association and ASM programmes can manage participant workflows without autonomous eligibility decisions or fund execution.
Participant applications
Keep each organisation’s registration, application, evidence and corrections inside its authorised scope.
Human assessment and appeals
Record missing evidence, reasons, decisions and an independent appeal process with accountable reviewers.
Monitoring and governed reporting
Track milestones and corrections, then separate internal oversight from approved public reporting.
Bring one real workflow. We’ll map these functions to your roles, records, systems and acceptance scenarios.
Assess your workflow